the admin_koach joke writes in part:
"After looking carefully at all of the chat servers recommended (and many others too), I came to the conclusion that none of them really offered what I was looking for. I wasn't interested in the very small servers; they just have no activity. I also wasn't interested in the very large networks (dalnet, efnet, etc). And I definately wasn't interested in any of the MSN clones, the servers which unethically (and perhaps illegally) use the MSN chat control. I'd never devote my time to a server that had to steal the hard work of others to be successful."what a freaking klown this guy is to write something like that. what was unethical and probably illegal was the way that koach (and others) mismanaged msn chat. what was unethical and probably illegal was the way that koach sat in the [un]help desk away in his cup 24x7 and did nothing to remove all the pornobots that cluttered up all the rooms that made it next to impossible for msn's chatter subscribers to join their favorite chatrooms,
what was unethical and probably illegal was the way that koach (and others) didnt do anything about the abusive chatters that so dominated the msn chat line, what was unethical and probably illegal was the way that koach (and others) wouldnt remove incompetent and abusive power tripping hosts, what was unethical and probably illegal was how koach (and others) only promoted the most incompetent hosts to cha, what was unethical and probably illegal was how koach (and others) made msn and by extension microsoft a major joke.
so, why in the world would any right thinking person reward koach's (and others) incompetence and unethical behavior by patronizing koach's chat server?
