**response to commenter 12:14 pm est friday 06 january 2006**thank you for your (3) comments - however your logic is flawed. msnoutstartcomparticipatesystems has known since at least 27th june 2000 about the hazardous effects of cyber addiction; you may view their own report on msn's media monolith - msnbc here http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3078769/
if msnoutstartcomparticipatesystems was truly interested in being good corporate netizens then they would do what they say and "protect" - their word not ours, their chatter/subscribers from potentially wrecking their lives and the lives of others - besides the fact that they are spammers to begin with.
so the question remains, why, arent pornobots/pornspammers watched for and removed just as quickly as some silly spectated chatter who cant even participate in chat and at the least provides some entertainment value whilst at the same time pornographers are allowed to park at will and continuously pornobots on the chatline which msn has shown have the potential to destroy msn's own chatter/subscribers lives?
its also interesting to note that on tuesday morning (03 january 2006) msnbc-tv was running a story about cyber addiction until the west virginia mine tragedy story broke - the report ran 2 or 3 times that morning then disappeared and has never been mentioned again also it was not put on msnbc.com website.
last nite around 8:45 pm est we were chatting in the msn chatroom thelobby1 when someone brought in a spectated passport with the msn chatnickname: Syflop_Vicky69
we noticed how almost instantly this spectated chatter was removed not once but about three times by one of the room bots. we have to wonder how can it be that msn's management can see something like this and remove it instantly and on the other hand allow pornobots as well as abusive chatters to park in the rooms continuously and at will for many days on end? does it make sense to you because it sure doesnt to us.
we do have to add though that the chat managers name is "vickie" or Sysop_vsi but still just because that spectated chatter has a chatnickname similar to hers doesnt mean that it was necessarily taking a swipe at her. anyway something just doesnt add up.
below is a snippit from the chat log and we have posted what we have of the chatlog here in .doc form.
Syflop_Vicky69 has joined the conversation.
Validation_Too : yep, they do for sure
8«Λ?phαMα?ε»™ has joined the conversation.
Ψ?C????Βΐ?ς?Ψ?™ : wb alpha(K)
Ψ?C????Βΐ?ς?Ψ?™ : lol
Validation_Too : but ~ better to give than receive ~ is my philosophy
«Λ?phαMα?ε»™ : ty
alphamale : ty
Validation_Too : wb Alpha
јамэѕ : 8-)
Ψ?C????Βΐ?ς?Ψ?™ : no kiss:'( i got demoted
јамэѕ : 8-)
«Λ?phαMα?ε»™ : ty 4 the ride val ;)
8Carrie2482 has left the conversation.
karnevor1 : remember when the Red Cross stopped goiving donars coffee after donations, Val?
јамэѕ : (N)
Validation_Too : yw Alpha
«Λ?phαMα?ε»™ : (K) 4 cfm :P
Validation_Too : always the helpful one
Ψ?C????Βΐ?ς?Ψ?™ : ty:$
8Rosie41461 has joined the conversation.
Validation_Too : well, they don't offer coffee where I donate
Validation_Too : it's juice or soda
јамэѕ : cunt
†Ms£ãdy† : or no orange juice
Host Syclops_Bot kicked Syflop_Vicky69 out of the chat room: Violation of the MSN Code of Conduct.
